| pm section | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:46 am | |
| here is were you post who you pmed
senital - pm |
|
| |
John Deep XFE Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 416 Age : 28 Location : Poland,Lublin Registration date : 2010-01-01
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:48 am | |
| You change your name again ? I don't see any sense for this topic | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:49 am | |
| |
|
| |
John Deep XFE Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 416 Age : 28 Location : Poland,Lublin Registration date : 2010-01-01
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:52 am | |
| Do you know what pm is ?? This is "PRIVATE" message | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:53 am | |
| yeah but some people don't reply lol |
|
| |
Worthy XFE Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2682 Age : 40 Location : Manchester, England Registration date : 2008-04-23
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:54 am | |
| For everyone I PM'd just list the XFE roster Joking aside, are you by any chance my old XFE rival Dominator? Just wondering as his name was Dominator in the game and fed, plus he had the same AJ Styles pic as you? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 3:54 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 4:45 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 6:27 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 6:57 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 7:14 am | |
| |
|
| |
Worthy XFE Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2682 Age : 40 Location : Manchester, England Registration date : 2008-04-23
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 8:55 am | |
| You do know that the reason people don't reply sometimes is because they are not online. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 8:58 am | |
| yeah but sometimes they are but still don't |
|
| |
Worthy XFE Hall of Famer
Number of posts : 2682 Age : 40 Location : Manchester, England Registration date : 2008-04-23
| Subject: Re: pm section 9/26/2010, 9:29 am | |
| Still you don't really need this thread because when someone gets a PM it will let them know at the top anyway, so if they ignore that then they won't take any notice of this thread and usually it's not intentional as some are popping in at work or are busy and don't have the time to reply to PM's straight away, plus some are not always online.
So for this reason i'm locking this thread. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: pm section | |
| |
|
| |
| pm section | |
|